Can anyone 'splain Fifty Shades of Gray to me?

Welcome to the Sir Terry Pratchett Forums
Register here for the Sir Terry Pratchett forum and message boards.
Sign up
I'm not the biggest fanfic fan, but most fanfic authors aren't doing it for fame or money. they just enjoy writing and have stories they want to share. and at most see it as practice. that article makes them out to be lowlife scum. find that kind of offensive cause its basically saying all fanworks are evil.

And I'd hardly call it plagiarism since they aren't claiming the characters and/or locations etc are their own.
 

high eight

Lance-Corporal
Dec 28, 2009
398
2,275
67
The Back of Beyond
raptornx01 said:
I'm not the biggest fanfic fan, but most fanfic authors aren't doing it for fame or money. they just enjoy writing and have stories they want to share. and at most see it as practice. that article makes them out to be lowlife scum. find that kind of offensive cause its basically saying all fanworks are evil.

And I'd hardly call it plagiarism since they aren't claiming the characters and/or locations etc are their own.
It is the fan fiction writers that say: "the author of this book got it wrong: Here is what they should have written" that really annoy me.

And the characters usually aren't their own. They just recycle the author's characters. Saves having to think up their own, I suppose.
 
high eight said:
It is the fan fiction writers that say: "the author of this book got it wrong: Here is what they should have written" that really annoy me.

And the characters usually aren't their own. They just recycle the author's characters.
They never claim the characters are their own (unless they are) that's the point.

Saves having to think up their own, I suppose.
kind of missing the point of fanfiction there. that's like looking at a period historical piece and going "god, these people are so lazy, why couldn't they make up their own characters instead of using real people"
 

high eight

Lance-Corporal
Dec 28, 2009
398
2,275
67
The Back of Beyond
raptornx01 said:
high eight said:
It is the fan fiction writers that say: "the author of this book got it wrong: Here is what they should have written" that really annoy me.

And the characters usually aren't their own. They just recycle the author's characters.
They never claim the characters are their own (unless they are) that's the point.

Saves having to think up their own, I suppose.
kind of missing the point of fanfiction there. that's like looking at a period historical piece and going "god, these people are so lazy, why couldn't they make up their own characters instead of using real people"
But a good writer of historical fiction does make up their own characters. They might be based on real people but they are very rarely slavish copies.

By comparison, fanfiction writers are just saying (for example): "how about some Nelson/Hardy slash? It's canon. He did ask for a kiss....." :laugh:
 

User Menu

Newsletter