I think this documentary was amazing and the critism is absurd and appears to be voiced mostly by people who either didn't watch or understand it.
To the people who said it was onesided, what else did you expect? We all know that Sir Terry is pro the choice to die with dignity and at a time of your choosing.
The documentary was listed as Terry examining the reality of people who have chosen to travel to dignitas, not as a discussion.
I think Mr Smedly was very brave, as was his wife in letting us see this most private of moments.
Terry was also very brave as he was sitting across the room from what might be his own future.
The law in this country makes no sense. We can abort children who would be born with a disabilty, or that we just don't want, we can starve someone in a persistant vegatative state to death, we can choose not to have ourselves or a relative resusitated.
BUT for some reason we can't let a perfectly lucid adult decide to slip away, in their own home(if own laws were like switzerland) before life becomes unbearable.
To the people who said it was onesided, what else did you expect? We all know that Sir Terry is pro the choice to die with dignity and at a time of your choosing.
The documentary was listed as Terry examining the reality of people who have chosen to travel to dignitas, not as a discussion.
I think Mr Smedly was very brave, as was his wife in letting us see this most private of moments.
Terry was also very brave as he was sitting across the room from what might be his own future.
The law in this country makes no sense. We can abort children who would be born with a disabilty, or that we just don't want, we can starve someone in a persistant vegatative state to death, we can choose not to have ourselves or a relative resusitated.
BUT for some reason we can't let a perfectly lucid adult decide to slip away, in their own home(if own laws were like switzerland) before life becomes unbearable.