Firefly/Serenity

Welcome to the Sir Terry Pratchett Forums
Register here for the Sir Terry Pratchett forum and message boards.
Sign up
Dec 4, 2010
3,049
2,600
59
Nova Scotia Canada
#41
Firefly & Serenity were both excellent. It's a real pity that the show did not even make it through 1 season. And it's the only show ever, which was canceled during the first season, yet they finished doing the rest of the episodes AND, made a movie after that.

If you like Nathan Fillion, you really need to watch "Castle"! Sorry, if I'm repeating here. I have not read all the posts. o_O
 

Quatermass

Sergeant-at-Arms
Dec 7, 2010
7,892
2,950
#46
Firefly? Serenity? *snort* Firefly is basically Joss Whedon ripping off Blake's 7. I mean, come on. Firefly is good and all, but Blake's 7 did it first, and in some cases, better. I mean, Mal Reynolds and his crew always seem to win the day, but did Roj Blake, Kerr Avon, and the others win time after time? Most of the time, they were barely lucky to get away with their lives.
 

pip

Sergeant-at-Arms
Sep 3, 2010
8,765
2,850
KILDARE
#47
Do you not find that Blake 7 has aged fairly badly .
And the crew of serenity took big big Knocks along the way and end up pushed to the edge of civilisation . Not a huge victory.
Aside from anything it was just getting into a stride when cut off unlike Blake 7 with 50+ episodes to develop story threads etc.

Firefly managed to achieve a lot in terms of impact in a much shorter time scale.
 

Quatermass

Sergeant-at-Arms
Dec 7, 2010
7,892
2,950
#48
pip said:
Do you not find that Blake 7 has aged fairly badly .
In terms of production values? Of course, but then again, I've watched a lot of Doctor Who from that era. But many of the stories haven't aged too badly. I mean, which other series has the main character framed for child molestation in the very first episode?


pip said:
And the crew of serenity took big big Knocks along the way and end up pushed to the edge of civilisation . Not a huge victory.
They're still alive (excepting Wash and Shepherd Book, which is a pity, as Jayne should have gone down the crapper), while Blake is definitely dead as a dodo, and the rest of the rebels are, in all likelihood.

pip said:
Aside from anything it was just getting into a stride when cut off unlike Blake 7 with 50+ episodes to develop story threads etc.

Firefly managed to achieve a lot in terms of impact in a much shorter time scale.
Pfft.*

*Now with added spittle!

There are elements of Firefly that I do like, most of them relating to Summer Glau as River Tam and Nathan Fillion (he's a good actor, despite the fact that Mal is a dick), but frankly, Blake's 7 did it first, and, production values and campiness aside, often, it did it better.

Besides, does Firefly have Paul Darrow in it?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWHLU8fwi80
 

pip

Sergeant-at-Arms
Sep 3, 2010
8,765
2,850
KILDARE
#49
I agree that if any character was to get killed off Jayne would have been an enjoyable choice but too easy as well.

I know this will get me kicked but i never really liked Doctor Who from any era.
Never got into it.

Blake 7 and Firefly are still too different for the kind of comparison you are making anyway.
Blake 7 did what first, Scifi o_O: or Dystopic future o_O: the whole reneagdes on the run thing o_O:

No offence but these have been done many times before Blake 7 and will be done again.
Genres cross but your accusing Joss Whedon of cloning Blake 7 then contradicting this by stating Blake 7 did this and that unlike Firefly.
Many films and tv of the 70's are Dystopic so how many was Blake 7 ripping themes from.
Logans Run etc etc etc ...............


Both are enjoyable for there own reasons and are different in many ways .

I never liked the sort of criticism for films or books or tv based on statements along the lines of that was crap because this was better
 

Quatermass

Sergeant-at-Arms
Dec 7, 2010
7,892
2,950
#51
pip said:
I agree that if any character was to get killed off Jayne would have been an enjoyable choice but too easy as well.

I know this will get me kicked but i never really liked Doctor Who from any era.
Never got into it.
Boot to the head. *whack*

pip said:
Blake 7 and Firefly are still too different for the kind of comparison you are making anyway.
Blake 7 did what first, Scifi o_O: or Dystopic future o_O: the whole reneagdes on the run thing o_O:
It did that sort of series where the main characters were not necessarily heroes, filled with moral ambiguity. I mean, Blake was a revolutionary at best, and he became more cynical and more willing to let the ends justify the means. Avon was an amoral computer hacker more than willing to go his own way (he's like Jayne, only with more brains and less muscles). Vila was a cowardly thief, Jenna a space pirate, Cally an alien terrorist, Zen an alien computer with a mind of its own, ORAC was a supercomputer with a bad attitude, Tarrant an arrogant little turd, Dayna a little too enthusiastic about weapons, and Soolin very mercenary. The most balanced of the cast was Gan, and not only was that only when his anti-murder chip wasn't on the fritz, but he got bumped off halfway through the second series.

This may sound nasty, but it made things interesting, with these guys less of a happy family and more of a dysfunctional group who found it hard to work together. Plus, they were all convicted criminals, to varying degrees of actual culpability.

Firefly is basically Blake's 7 watered down and neutered. Very few of the crew are self-interested, despite Mal being a dick. There are more happy endings. At least Blake's 7 is not afraid to make the characters lose.

Or cast non-glamourous looking males in the leads. Women were a different matter, but that was the 70s...


pip said:
Genres cross but your accusing Joss Whedon of cloning Blake 7 then contradicting this by stating Blake 7 did this and that unlike Firefly.
I didn't say that it was a perfect clone. As I said above, many of the things Blake's 7 did differently were done right. One of them, however, was not production values. If Blake's 7 had Firefly's production values...

Well, let's just say that this trailer makes Blake's 7 look good.



pip said:
Many films and tv of the 70's are Dystopic so how many was Blake 7 ripping themes from.
Logans Run etc etc etc ...............
Blake's 7 was conceived at about the same time as the original film of Logan's Run, but Terry Nation (the creator of Blake's 7, as well as the Daleks) had visited dystopian science fiction before. He created, probably well before its time, a fairly realistic post-apocalyptic drama called Survivors, about the world after a superflu pandemic, years before The Stand was published. And then you have similar worlds visited in Terry Nation's Doctor Who stories The Daleks, The Keys of Marinus, Genesis of the Daleks...


pip said:
I never liked the sort of criticism for films or books or tv based on statements along the lines of that was crap because this was better
Hey, I'm an opinionated little bugger, and I detest most American science fiction (with the exceptions of Futurama, Dune, and the Vorkosiagn Saga). Unrepentantly opinionated and prejudiced. I don't mind you liking Firefly and Serenity. There is much to recommend the franchise. I just don't like it much myself, partly out of personal taste and partly because Blake's 7 pretty much did it first.

But then again, well, I suppose if it comes down to opinions, this wee quote from Blake's 7 about the matter is rather apposite:

Vila: I'm entitled to my opinion.
Avon: It is your assumption that we are all entitled to it as well that is irritating.
 

Quatermass

Sergeant-at-Arms
Dec 7, 2010
7,892
2,950
#52
I would like to clarify, given the length of my previous post, that I have nothing against Firefly fans (or Browncoats, as I have heard that you are called). And while I consider Blake's 7 superior, Firefly is still amongst the best of American science fiction TV. I just don't personally find it engaging enough for me. And I have tried.
 

pip

Sergeant-at-Arms
Sep 3, 2010
8,765
2,850
KILDARE
#53
Quatermass said:
I would like to clarify, given the length of my previous post, that I have nothing against Firefly fans (or Browncoats, as I have heard that you are called). And while I consider Blake's 7 superior, Firefly is still amongst the best of American science fiction TV. I just don't personally find it engaging enough for me. And I have tried.
No problems here with disagreement and open debate by the way so no worries that on this one thing we disagree. And i do like Blake 7 and am a big fan of a lot of the Anti-hero and dystopic stuff that came out in the 70's and 80's and even before that.
And i probably do deserve the kick on Doctor Who.
The missus is a huge fan so maybe its over exposure but hey.
:laugh:
 

Quatermass

Sergeant-at-Arms
Dec 7, 2010
7,892
2,950
#54
pip said:
Quatermass said:
I would like to clarify, given the length of my previous post, that I have nothing against Firefly fans (or Browncoats, as I have heard that you are called). And while I consider Blake's 7 superior, Firefly is still amongst the best of American science fiction TV. I just don't personally find it engaging enough for me. And I have tried.
No problems here with disagreement and open debate by the way so no worries that on this one thing we disagree. And i do like Blake 7 and am a big fan of a lot of the Anti-hero and dystopic stuff that came out in the 70's and 80's and even before that.
And i probably do deserve the kick on Doctor Who.
The missus is a huge fan so maybe its over exposure but hey.
:laugh:
Well, Nigel Kneale, the writer of the Quatermass serials from whom I take my username, detested Doctor Who and Blake's 7, so I don't exactly think much of the man, but his work...well, look up The Year of the Sex Olympics on Wikipedia, and see how much he predicted the advent of reality TV.

Anyhoo, I do think that it's a great pity Whedon didn't do further series of Firefly. It seems to be the curse of many a good show to be cancelled either before their time, or else when they are starting to improve.
 

Phoenix

Lance-Corporal
Oct 4, 2009
302
2,275
Hampshire, England
#56
Conforumist said:
Firefly & Serenity were both excellent. It's a real pity that the show did not even make it through 1 season. And it's the only show ever, which was canceled during the first season, yet they finished doing the rest of the episodes AND, made a movie after that.

If you like Nathan Fillion, you really need to watch "Castle"! Sorry, if I'm repeating here. I have not read all the posts. o_O
Castle is pretty good, but Buffy, Slither (alien parasitic slugs turning people into zombies? Why, yes please :laugh: :p ) and Dr Horrible's Sing-Along Blog are also must-see's :laugh:


Tonight my Dad asked which was better: Firefly or Serenity. I think my brain may have melted slightly as I attempted to explain how they were equally, but differently, awesome ;) Firefly definitely has better character depth and potential for development, but Serenity is one of my favourite comfort films. Sometimes a girl needs to know that the good space cowboys will win :p
 

pip

Sergeant-at-Arms
Sep 3, 2010
8,765
2,850
KILDARE
#58
DaveC said:
Been hard for me to stay away from this debate - I'll just say that my parents were avid Blake's 7 fans, and my dad loved the bits of Firefly he saw, I haven't really seen much so I can't say anything.
Wondered where you were hiding on this one :laugh:
 

User Menu

Newsletter