Hmm ... Nation and Dodger are two very different stories, but I can see why TP was proud of it. It is difficult to get into the head of any character - i.e. to think as he/she thinks, say what he/she would say etc. It's doubly-difficult when the character and the author have nothing in common - i.e. no cultural/racial/class background, etc.
Of course it would be difficult for TP to get into the POV of any character in Dodger - after all, 19th-century people didn't think about life as we do, because life was very different then, and much harder. But for all that, TP shared a cultural background with many of the characters in the book. So it'd have been easier for him to think like - for instance - Charlie Dickens, or Henry Mayhew, than to think like Mau.
I hope this isn't coming across as offensive. All I'm saying is that birds of a feather think about similar things. After all, bankers think and talk about banking, lawyers and politicians about the law, plumbers about plumbing and so on.
Similarly, TP would have found it easy to think like Dickens because they were both journalists (albeit at different times). But how do you begin to think like a teenager who has lost everything? Especially on a far-away continent that hadn't been explored yet? Yes, that is a challenge. TP would have had to create the culture of Mau's tribe, then re-create it for Mau specifically, and then re-create it again when Daphne and Mau begin to work together.
So for all these reasons, I'm not surprised Terry was proud of this book. He had much to be proud of.
Of course it would be difficult for TP to get into the POV of any character in Dodger - after all, 19th-century people didn't think about life as we do, because life was very different then, and much harder. But for all that, TP shared a cultural background with many of the characters in the book. So it'd have been easier for him to think like - for instance - Charlie Dickens, or Henry Mayhew, than to think like Mau.
I hope this isn't coming across as offensive. All I'm saying is that birds of a feather think about similar things. After all, bankers think and talk about banking, lawyers and politicians about the law, plumbers about plumbing and so on.
Similarly, TP would have found it easy to think like Dickens because they were both journalists (albeit at different times). But how do you begin to think like a teenager who has lost everything? Especially on a far-away continent that hadn't been explored yet? Yes, that is a challenge. TP would have had to create the culture of Mau's tribe, then re-create it for Mau specifically, and then re-create it again when Daphne and Mau begin to work together.
So for all these reasons, I'm not surprised Terry was proud of this book. He had much to be proud of.
Likes:
=Tamar