SPOILERS Snuff *Warning Spoilers*

Welcome to the Sir Terry Pratchett Forums
Register here for the Sir Terry Pratchett forum and message boards.
Sign up

raisindot

Sergeant-at-Arms
Oct 1, 2009
5,274
2,450
Boston, MA USA
Sorry, Swreader, your arguments just don't hold up.

In Guards! Guards!, Vimes 'redemption' was largely the influence of Carrot and Sybil, who believed that he could be something more than an ineffectual drunk. There's no evidence whatsoever that Vimes was thinking of himself in terms of "upholding the law" or "enforcing justice," whether Vetinari believed he could be a better man or not. Vimes was simply dealing with a threat to the city.

At the beginning of Men at Arms, Vimes is about to retire. In fact, he has very little to do in the book in terms of "solving the crime;' Carrot does most of the work. Only when Vimes sees the danger the gonne poses to public order and safety does he take an active role in trying to solve the crime. But, again, this is simply whodunnit stuff--find the killer, stop the gonne. Nothing to do with an any true feeling about the Law Vimes has developed.

In Feet of Clay, Vimes' burning of Dragon's books is nothing more than a vigilante act of retribution. The act would do nothing to keep Dragon from continuing his manipulations, since Dragon already has the histories of the old families in his head and, as Vetinari himself says, these histories could be reconstructed by the families themselves if need be. The act doesn't represent any kind of justice at all, since it's outside the bounds of AM laws. Vimes is not thinking in terms of the Law or as somehow who upholds the Law; he is someone who is feeding a private vendetta because he knows justice won't truly be served.

Certainly VImes has evolved in these books. The Vimes of Men at Arms is a better, smarter copper than the Vimes of Guards! Guards. The Vimes of LOC demonstrates, for the first time, those 'street-smart' skills and sympathy for the oppressed that will become the core elements of the Vimes in later books, as well as his growing tolerance for non-human races, including his realization (with Carrot's help) that golems are sentient beings.

But, to this point, Vimes never truly seriously thinks about what The Law means and his own relationship to it. Until Jingo, he is essentially a crime-fighter and threat-eraser. The Law he is serving is Vetinari's law, and the laws of Ankh Morpork. But the events of Jingo demonstrate to Vimes that even when nations operate within their own laws, even the laws of warfare, they are breaking a higher law--the Law that says that it is a crime for little crimes to cause bigger crimes. When he "arrests" both armies, he is essentially enforcing a higher law--the law of humanity itself. And, even then, he comes very close to breaking this law when he realizes that sometimes it's impossible to fully enforce. It is here that Vimes truly begins to think in abstract terms. He is much more than Vetinari's terrier; he is becoming the world's peacemaker. He also realizes that if he's going to be the world's chief law enforcer, he can no longer commit acts like burning down businesses, or even letting the manacled Vetinari go. The Law must apply to everyone.

From this point on, Vimes' perception of what the Law really is--and his role in enforcing it--will become central themes in the Guards books.
 
Nov 13, 2011
97
1,650
In Men at Arms there are several things keeping Vimes on task. One was the fact that Hammerhock's death was impacting dwarf-troll relations, another was that he was annoyed by the classism of the Assassins and the city nobles, yet another was that the Gonne-wielder killed the beggar girl (Queen Molly's attendant). It's not just that the Gonne was dangerous, the person wielding it was causing chaos and killing underdogs. These trends were there before FOC.
 

feanor

Lance-Corporal
May 24, 2009
130
2,275
59
Hi All...

Just reporting in to say that I've finished Snuff, and enjoyed it.

I have to say I had Goosies, wondering when Stratford would strike after escaping, and was expecting a good scrap with Vimes to top it all off. But was pleased that Willikins had the Honour. There was a nice bit of Tension too with Vimes beating the Locals round to his POV, Young Sams Poo obsession was a little too much though, LOL. I'm gonna make a start on UA Tomorrow again, wish me Luck !

It has spurred me to to read Guards Guard again after Catching up. I wanna see Vimes as a Drunk again to see how far he's come...
 
Jan 13, 2012
2,337
2,600
South florida, US
www.youtube.com
feanor said:
Hi All...

Just reporting in to say that I've finished Snuff, and enjoyed it.

I have to say I had Goosies, wondering when Stratford would strike after escaping, and was expecting a good scrap with Vimes to top it all off. But was pleased that Willikins had the Honour. There was a nice bit of Tension too with Vimes beating the Locals round to his POV, Young Sams Poo obsession was a little too much though, LOL. I'm gonna make a start on UA Tomorrow again, wish me Luck !

It has spurred me to to read Guards Guard again after Catching up. I wanna see Vimes as a Drunk again to see how far he's come...
i'm gonna give it a little time then i wanna do a full watch run again. or you could say a full Ank run. GG, MatA, FoC, Jingo, T5thE, NW, Thud, and Snuff, and occasionally i'll add in the truth, GP, monstrous regiment, and MM in their appropriate spots. may do it this time, depending on my mood.
 

raisindot

Sergeant-at-Arms
Oct 1, 2009
5,274
2,450
Boston, MA USA
raptornx01 said:
i'm gonna give it a little time then i wanna do a full watch run again. or you could say a full Ank run. GG, MatA, FoC, Jingo, T5thE, NW, Thud, and Snuff, and occasionally i'll add in the truth, GP, monstrous regiment, and MM in their appropriate spots. may do it this time, depending on my mood.
What, no UA? (Wouldn't blame you if you didn't.) :laugh:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
And Colon and Nobby were in Soul Music... (seriously, is there ANY Post-G!G! book in AM where none of the watch appears?)
 

Pearwood

Constable
Feb 21, 2011
52
2,150
Ok, just finished Snuff yesterday. My thoughts:

The Good (with some caveats):
- I liked the snooker metaphor although it didn't really turn out to be that apt as Vimes never even saw the black, let alone potted it.
- Feeny wasn't a bad character. Neither was Makepeace though he was criminally underused.
- The River Boat chase was OK. Stratford's trick was a nice idea though didn't really make a lot of sense. Either he fell asleep on guard duty (which I don't buy) or he knew Vimes would be coming (how could he?) and set up an elaborate trap for him.
- I liked the ungue pot concept though nothing much was done with it. I thought there'd be a revelation that snuff boxes were actually ungue pots (what with the title), but no. When did everyone start snorting snuff every 2 seconds anyway?
- It made me appreciate Unseen Academicals by comparison.

The Bad
- It wasn't funny in the slightest. I see some here are claiming that this is Pratchett maturing into a serious writer, but I disagree. Pratchett has done serious before with Night Watch (a book I admittedly don't like, but don't think badly written). There's tons of jokes in Snuff however, it's just that none are funny.
- The Summoning Dark does all the work for Vimes.
- Vimes never is in any danger or makes any mistakes.
- When did Vimes become such an obnoxious bore? He rabbits on about The Law and every fifth word in his long speeches was "Copper". What does he mean by the Law anyway? The self-appointed magistrates can't decide what is law apparently but he and/or Vetinari can?
- Despite the horribleness of the goblins' situation I was never really moved by their plight. I felt more sorry for Nutt in UA.
- Young Sam is neither endearing nor interesting.
- Several characters seemed off. Sybil, Cheery and Nobby are good examples, but the worst culprit is Willikns. The charm of this character is that he appeals to be a Jeeves like valet but there is a hint of something dangerous behind this pleasant facade. Here that hint is spelt out in detail as Willikins goes on about how hard he is. Ugh.
- Terry's writing has always been brilliantly structured. He puts words in exactly the right place to convey meaning. Not so here. In fact, the bacon, LETTUCE and tomato joke seeemed like such a bad imitation of this skill that I wondered if maybe this was ghost written.
- Stratford wasn't a threatening villain, nor could I care that much about him as he was only a puppet. Gravid never appeared nor did we learn his true motives (since he was rich anyway would he have gone to this trouble for simple profit).
- The Fred Colon subplot was both over-coincidental and too easily sorted.
- Did we really need 3 different characters pissing themselves?

Without doubt my least favourite Discworld book. Ah well, I still have I Shall Wear Midnight to read so hopefully that's better.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
On the note of Pearwood's post:
Do you folks think one can sort the Discworld books like 'comic ages'
With the first 5-7 books being it's 'stone age' the things thereafter up to Nightwatch being the golden age, then a brief silver age with GP and Thud (not counting MR) and that now it has entered the dark age?
 

Pearwood

Constable
Feb 21, 2011
52
2,150
Roughly though I'm not sure I would agree with you with where the borders lie. I think the Golden Age would start with Mort (I like the first 3 books but Terry was finding his feet with them I think - Light Fantastic would be my pick of the bunch) and I would end it with The Last Hero. The Last Hero seems like a sort of celebration of what came before and I actually half expected it to be the last book. After that I find it all pretty mixed so it's hard to define what would be silver age and what would be dark age. For the record, I thought Monstrous Regiment was much better than GP or Thud. Wee Free Men was also very good.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
The border vanish indeed. But the trend that less and less people like the past 3-4 (whether you count ISWM or not) books for pretty much the same reasons is weirdly there.
 

raisindot

Sergeant-at-Arms
Oct 1, 2009
5,274
2,450
Boston, MA USA
I've always thought the Pterry's literary trajectory is very similar to that of Shakespeare. Both started off as rather derivative writers trying to outdo contemporaries, but developed increasing depth over time, with signature works serving as "signposts" of evolution of their mastery.

I think of Pterry's first few books as the equivalent of Shakespeare's first few Richard VI plays. Nothing to write home about.

"Mort" is Pterry's Richard III--a play that signalled a sudden broadening of depth and originality.

"Small Gods" is Pterry's "Merchant of Venice"; after a period of gradually increasingly depth, Pterry, like Shakespeare. demonstrates a whole new level of insights into the human condition that hadn't appeared in previous works.

From this point on, for both authors, the work gradually gets better and better with a large number of bona fide masterpieces produced, until a gradual decline, which (for me at least) started with Making Money, the equivalent of Shakespeare's Coriolanus, and the lesser works like UA and Snuff, being Pterry's Timon of Athens and Cymbeline, with the occasional remaining good work--I Shall Wear Midnight--in Pterry's case--serving as a symbolic code in the same way The Tempest served, in some ways, as Shakespeare's.
 
Nov 13, 2011
97
1,650
Appearances of members of the Watch in non-Watch books:

Moving Pictures - Fred Colon and Nobby
Reaper Man - Fred Colon
Soul Music - Fred Colon and Nobby appear, Carrot is mentioned
Maskerade - Detritus and Nobby
Hogfather - Nobby and Visit (Carrot is mentioned indirectly)
The Truth - Nobby, Fred Colon, Vimes, Angua, Detritus, Igor, maybe a few others
The Last Hero - Carrot and Vimes
Monstrous Regiment - Vimes, Angua, Reg Shoe and Buggy
Going Postal - Vimes, Angua, Nobby, others?
Making Money - Vimes, Angua, Nobby, Fred Colon, Carrot, Detritus, Haddock
Unseen Academicals - Vimes, Angua, Haddock, Bluejohn ... ?
I Shall Wear Midnight - Vimes, Carrot, Angua, Wee Mad Arthur, Nobby, Haddock
 
Nov 13, 2011
97
1,650
I include Monstrous Regiment and both Moist books among the better ones, personally (Making Money is a classical middle book of a trilogy, I await the conclusion). Overall, of the first 10 books, when Pratchett is good he is more cute than deep. And that isn't bad, but doesn't go very far. I prefer the theme/character/joke balance of the later books.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Worst thing to be whatever is the third moist book:
Moist gets forced into yet another position that has something to do with finances. A villain who's a pale copy of Gilt shows up and is totally against any changes. Adora gets watered down and after 600 odd pages of what's basically a rerun of GP Moist finds the perfect new financial thing and he and Adora are still not married.
 
Nov 13, 2011
97
1,650
Well, we know what the third government position is supposed to be. And in contrast to the previous two it isn't about providing the people something they *like*. (At least, not directly.) So Moist can't use his old techniques. There has to be a twist. Also, his criminal past is known. How can a thief tell them not to steal from the city? But in the end Moist will find a way to sell paying taxes to the Morporkians. And it should involve the completion of his growth into a servant of the public. The classical development of a trilogy is that the second part repeats the main points of the first. This shows a pattern was established. The third is where the bits that are still not working in the pattern are fixed.

(Why should Moist and Adora marry? Carrot and Angua are still not married after some 11 years.)
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
WEll, as said, 'worst case'.
(Though the absolute worst case, storywise, would be if Moist miraculously reforms not only AM's taxsystem but also the one of Pseudopolis because those dumb, dumb buggers would be so lost and helpless without the aid from the great and outstandingly awesome AM. Seriously, if that happens Discworld'll be dead to me./rant )
 

User Menu

Newsletter