Well, I have made a start (again) on Jingo. I know that part of Terry's stock-in-trade is making a joke of human failings, just to emphasise that they are failings. And mostly I'm fine with that. The kind of sexism mentioned above by eternalmetal comes down to authority vs individual, and gives the individual a chance to triumph over authority by proving that they are capable, after all. I think most of us like the "underdog bites back" scenario.
I think my problem with Jingo is that there is no underdog. The people on both sides of the argument are equally wrong, so there's nobody to cheer for. Lord Vetinari does at one point neatly express how symmetrical the situation is. I just keep seeing the expressed attitudes as a poison inherent in human nature, and that jolts me back into the real world, when normally I read Discworld to escape from that.
I think now I'll just have to accept that there are things in the book I don't like, and focus on the plot and the characters who are trying to find a sane solution to the problem.
Mary
I think my problem with Jingo is that there is no underdog. The people on both sides of the argument are equally wrong, so there's nobody to cheer for. Lord Vetinari does at one point neatly express how symmetrical the situation is. I just keep seeing the expressed attitudes as a poison inherent in human nature, and that jolts me back into the real world, when normally I read Discworld to escape from that.
I think now I'll just have to accept that there are things in the book I don't like, and focus on the plot and the characters who are trying to find a sane solution to the problem.
Mary