mspanners said:
So if Twoflower was not meant to be of Oriental stock then why was His home a near copy of pre communist China....
I think Twoflower was Americanised for the TV show to appeal to the market place,the US is one of the biggest markets and by making Twoflower More American than Oriental the show would attract a bigger audience.
Well that my opinion, make of it what you will.
Having read mspanners insistent comments -- which amount to (in my opinion) if Terry & the Mob had asked me how to cast this movie, here are the changes I would have insisted on--
Come on,
mspanners-- who died and made you gods. Terry and the film company decided to cast this in a particular fashion. The only legitimate comment one could make is that YOU think it would have been better to cast an oriental in the role of Twoflower.
As a matter of fact, I agree with that position myself (because that is indeed how I picture the character). And certainly, not having seen Color of Magic, I cannot comment on how effective the American actor was, but everyone seems to think he did a good job of playing the quintessential tourist. But the fact is-- the book is fiction. The movie is a fictional creation of a work of fiction. And as Tony pointed out, Terry has shown that if he has strong objections to the way something is proposed to be filmed, he will not allow that producer to film it. So, Terry did not object to this actor.
I happen to think it was a less than optimal choice of the race of actor, but I don't know all the problems or complexities which went into making this picture. If Terry was satisfied, then I think it's rather silly to complain. What do you expect them to do? Remake the movie to your specifications?
As for the idea that an American actor was chosen to increase American sales--if you knew anything at all about American film audiences you would know just how ludicrious that statement is.
In the first place probably 80% of the audience at any given performance would not have read the book, and so would not be influenced one way or the other. The actor is not a big enough "name" to draw audiences (and there are few of those around these days). And if one really thought that a somewhat unflattering portrait of a character as played by a Caucasian American (you know Americans come in all colors--one of our Black Americans is running for President at the moment)rather than an oriental would increase the sales--well one simply doesn't know what one is talking about!
This, by the way, to everyone, is why I dislike having books made into movies--and the better the book the more I dislike it. Movies, even special ones like
LOTR, have to modify and delete things because that's the nature of the time of movies. Further, each individual who reads the book sees the characters differently. That does not make any one's vision "Right" or "Wrong" -- it simply makes it that individual's.