The Hobbit is finally greenlit!

Welcome to the Sir Terry Pratchett Forums
Register here for the Sir Terry Pratchett forum and message boards.
Sign up

Looking forward to The Hobbit films

  • Yes

    Votes: 10 100.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Curious

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    10
#1
After years of financial woes relating to MGM's bankruptcy, The Hobbit has finally been given a greenlight with Peter Jackson now directing instead of Guillermo Del Toro, who was scheduled to direct but pulled out due to the delays.

The Story

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=29220

Some Casting news...

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=29224

I can't wait to see what the two films will look like, with a different younger Bilbo, simpler story and the influence of Del Toro's designs and scripting imput on Jackson's directon.
 

Jan Van Quirm

Sergeant-at-Arms
Nov 7, 2008
8,524
2,800
Dunheved, Kernow
www.janhawke.me.uk
#3
Guillermo del Toro's having to go was a pity, but he's still made a significant contribution to the screenplay. :)

I'm looking forward to seeing how they handle the main storyline because the 'second part' that Tolkien didn't include in the novel is going to be controversial, just because of that because the canon is more or less wide open to interpretation there. Lots of excitement amongst the fans and, I expect, the CGI chaps, as there's all kinds of leeway for evil creatures aside from orcses and nassssty spiders. And the Nazgul should get a lot more to do in this as well! :twisted:
 
#4
Jan Van Quirm said:
Guillermo del Toro's having to go was a pity, but he's still made a significant contribution to the screenplay. :)

I'm looking forward to seeing how they handle the main storyline because the 'second part' that Tolkien didn't include in the novel is going to be controversial, just because of that because the canon is more or less wide open to interpretation there. Lots of excitement amongst the fans and, I expect, the CGI chaps, as there's all kinds of leeway for evil creatures aside from orcses and nassssty spiders. And the Nazgul should get a lot more to do in this as well! :twisted:
When Del Toro was in charge he was going to do a lot more practical than CG, don't know what the case will be with Jackson, he likes CG and practiccal, it will 3D ( :cry: ) so I don't know what will look best for that.
 

Jan Van Quirm

Sergeant-at-Arms
Nov 7, 2008
8,524
2,800
Dunheved, Kernow
www.janhawke.me.uk
#6
Lifted from DreamWorlds (thanks Miah!
) :laugh:

Casting for The Hobbit has now been announced >>HERE<<

Bilbo- Martin Freeman
Thorin- Richard Armitage
Fili- Robert Kazinsky
Kili- Aidan Turner
Dwalin- Graham McTavish
Oin- John Callen
Bombur- Stephen Hunter
Dori- Mark Hadlow
Gloin- Peter Hambelton

Hehe - and Guy of Gisbourne (Mr Vicar of Dribley) is Thorin! :twisted:
 

Jan Van Quirm

Sergeant-at-Arms
Nov 7, 2008
8,524
2,800
Dunheved, Kernow
www.janhawke.me.uk
#12
The Mad Collector said:
Jan Van Quirm said:
Guy of Gisbourne (Mr Vicar of Dribley) is Thorin! :twisted:
Dribley :rolleyes: :rolleyes: , is that a Freudian slip?
Not really 'cos it was on purpose - Dawn French is about the only woman who could get away with a comedy about a vicar of any gender, but Richard Armitage is definitely worth getting all dribbly over! :laugh: :twisted:

This movie is starting to become pretty heavy on hype though with I suspect much heavy weather over all the setbacks and panics over getting Ian McClellan and Andy Serkis back in to do Gandalf and Gollum it's beginning to grate a wee bit as being rather orchestrated :rolleyes:

There's no way this movie is going to be cancelled at this rate, so all this 'tension' is starting to irritate me :rolleyes:
 
#13
The main panic is where they are filming - there are doubts over whether New Zealand's tax cuts are worth filming there as many other countries are more affordable. Aparrently the NZ Prime Minister is meeting with Warner Bros to discuss soonn as it mean so much to their ecconomy for the next couple of years if they do film there.
 

Jan Van Quirm

Sergeant-at-Arms
Nov 7, 2008
8,524
2,800
Dunheved, Kernow
www.janhawke.me.uk
#14
Exactly :laugh: With all the ties to NZ on this set, not to mention WETA's being so hand in glove with Jackson on tricksy tech stuff, a lot of both films are already there anyway, so I doubt the govt are going to get too stroppy over it bearing in mind how much they made off the back of the Trilogy :rolleyes:
 

Finomans

Lance-Corporal
Jul 5, 2010
156
2,275
The Netherlands
#18
They better do every single thing that is in the book. because I thought leaving out Tom Bombadill was really stupid of them he was one of my favorite characters. And they are going to do it in two parts and of all of the LORT books the hobbit is one of the thinnest.
 

Jan Van Quirm

Sergeant-at-Arms
Nov 7, 2008
8,524
2,800
Dunheved, Kernow
www.janhawke.me.uk
#19
Tom B's not everyone's favourite of course - he's certainly an acquired taste and it's arguable that the Old Forest segments would have added much to the action narrative of the Trilogy :rolleyes: But then as Christopher Lee pointed out rather vigorously, cutting the Scouring of the Shire out of the ending was virtually a criminal act and failed to properly vindicate the Shire Hobbits involvement altogether... :devil:

However - this is Hollywood and Tolkien's not around to do his nut over liberties taken. :eek:

With the Hobbit I think it won't get cut quite so indiscriminately as it's largely more action-based than some parts of the LotR (being written for younger people with a limited attention span which does roughly equate to that of a 'normal' cinema audience will help a lot in this I think... ;) ) so less likely to be skipped over quite so cavalierly. The thing with having 2 movies is that the Hobbit encompasses, but does not go into canon lore that Tolkien only made very brief references to in the book - the Siege of Dol Guldur. This event takes place in the south of Mirkwood, a couple of hundred miles away from the track Bilbo and the dwarves took, and is what will be featured in the later parts of the films. For the film-makers it's simply a case of following Gandalf when he parts company with the dwarves after they leave the house of Beorn the skin-changer and go South to meet Elrond, Celeborn, Radagast and Saruman and push the Necromancer out of his lair. The military sequences are likely to be spectacularly heavy on the CGI as there are a lot of magic-wielders in there so it's quite a mixed feeling of anticipation and apprehension as to how much of this will be put in as Tolkien only made fairly light sketches accounting for this event, which in fact is more important lore-wise than Bilbo finding the ring in some respects :eek:

Anyway - the 3 films were successful on the whole if you can get over certain aberrations (the Scouring and ditching Glorfindel in favour of Arwen were the worst ones for me) and TBH for modern audiences trying to squeeze everything in would likely have lessened the wow factor for some of the less dynamic events, so horses for courses I suppose o_O

I very much doubt that the Silmarillion will be made over in my lifetime - but I live to be amazed in that respect :laugh: ;)
 

Stumped

Lance-Constable
Nov 12, 2010
31
2,150
#20
This is great news! :laugh: There is so much hard work and talent that goes into these films. I applaud Peter Jackson for being so committed with them.
 

User Menu

Newsletter