The Hobbit is finally greenlit!

Welcome to the Sir Terry Pratchett Forums
Register here for the Sir Terry Pratchett forum and message boards.
Sign up

Looking forward to The Hobbit films

  • Yes

    Votes: 10 100.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Curious

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    10
Apr 29, 2009
11,929
2,525
London
I wondered that, too, Penners.

It's not as if Hwood is going to lose money over it. They're not selling iffy merchandise, etc.

Lawyers trying to justify their huge retainer, methinks.
 

Jan Van Quirm

Sergeant-at-Arms
Nov 7, 2008
8,524
2,800
Dunheved, Kernow
www.janhawke.me.uk
Not just the movie companies though - The Tolkien Estate was itself royally screwed over by New Line when the Trilogy came out and they were tied up for years with trying to claw back profits lost through the small print on merchandising after the success of the films (so were Peter Jackson and the cast).

Consequently this new licensee has probably paid through the nose for the privilege of marketing Tolkiena and certainly anyone who uses images of Elijah Wood or any other cast member to promote their business IS infringing copyright quite badly so really this pub isn't quite so innocent as they make out - that IS exploiting general trademark/merchandising rights trading.

Last year The Tolkien Estate had an enormous purge on Zazzle and anything that mentioned Tolkien and especially Hobbit-related names and characters were taken off sale by the bots without exception if they so much mentioned anything that originated with Tolkien including names like Nazgul or Anduin or Mirkwood. I had a fair amount of merchandise that I had to go through and overhaul the wording before I could put them back up and I was one of the luckier people in that none of my range had artwork that featured landscapes or drawings featuring imagery derived from the films (lot of fanart with Mr Woods, Bloom and Mortenson and Ms. Blanchett and Tyler knocking around... o_O ) so this time the merchandising is zipped up to the hilt. :angry-cussingblack:
 

pip

Sergeant-at-Arms
Sep 3, 2010
8,765
2,850
KILDARE
The excitement .

Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet Is it here yet
 
Apr 29, 2009
11,929
2,525
London
My friend Mary, who has 2 sons of her own, and fostered shedloads more, can heartily recommend that, when baby is just starting to get to solids, you DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES give him or her Weetabix, unless you want the Mother of all Nappys to change. :eek:
 
Jul 27, 2008
19,892
3,400
Stirlingshire, Scotland
Two would have been good, but if there is a bit of a pre equal about Smeagol first I don't mind because its my favorite book in the saga, or there may be a bit of the Simarillion in there as well, but Jan would be the person to give an insight on this. :mrgreen:
 

Jan Van Quirm

Sergeant-at-Arms
Nov 7, 2008
8,524
2,800
Dunheved, Kernow
www.janhawke.me.uk
Have only skim read the link article and a bit of the one referred to in that from ComicCon. :rolleyes:

Thing is there is no 'book' to model the prequel/concurrent storyline to this which isn't just based on Appendices to Return of the King but also to other notes which are cobbled together in one of the later books in a series of 12 that make up the marathon called The History of Middle Earth which is is actually Christopher Tolkien's archive material of his father's notes going back to before his parents were married. So it's certainly more than 125 pages of manuscript notes which are exactly that and not even as polished as some of the sketchier parts of the Silmarillion.

The 'extra' film is partly from the LoTR appendices and the rest from the part of HoME, Vol 12 Peoples of Middle Earth and is a typical Tolkien 'arse about face' piece of backtracking :rolleyes: as the LoTR piece was done first and fills in the bits of The Hobbit where Gandalf swans off leaving the dwarves up to their ears in Woodelves and Spiders and the latter was done afterwards, and before he started in on The Silmarillion in earnest that deals with what happens before The Hobbit when Gandalf discovers Thorin Oakenshield's (Richard Armitage) delirious and dying father in the Necromancer's dungeons and manages to liberate the map and secret key that sparks the whole adventure off.

So I imagine what's happened is that, because there's no book but plenty of notes and outlines knocking around, Mr & Mrs. Jackson have been embroidering long and hard on the 'not properly told' stories before the momentous party and then the parts that weren't dwelt upon at all in the several months in between Gandalf leaving the Dwarves and Bilbo on the western side of Mirkwood and then popping up again in time for the Battle of the Five Armies at the end of the Hobbit. Both add-ons are dark and ominous in that they deal with an 'about to go into his flaming eye phase' Sauron terrorising the southern parts of Mirkwood and generally making life hard for Galadriel and Celeborn over the river in Lothlorien and for Legolas' daddy in the north of Mirkwood. The Elven backstory's quite a potboiler as it brings up a load of bad blood involving Celeborn's and Thranduil's (Legolas dad) family and may throw some light on just why Legolas and Gimli hate each other's guts to start with... :p

In a way it's the story of power of the Elven Rings as well, as the battle that Gandalf (and his cousin Radagast) has with the Necromancer is largely one of power wielding by Galadriel, Elrond and the Wiz (as the 3 ring holders) and also the beginning of Saruman's treachery, so a lot potentially happens. It's certainly a much more adult-oriented tale with the earlier part with Thorin's father happening before Bilbo was only a very small and infantile hobbit :p

So maybe not quite Twilight or Deathly Hallows carve-up territory, but there's likely been a lot of extra and speculative footage kicking in so there should certainly be enough for 2 very long films - I guess we'll have to see how far they get in this first film come Xmas to gauge how much more they've got to mil... get through... :| :twisted:
 

User Menu

Newsletter