Worst Film Ever Watched!

Welcome to the Sir Terry Pratchett Forums
Register here for the Sir Terry Pratchett forum and message boards.
Sign up
Jan 23, 2014
822
2,425
#61
Excuse me! Plan 9 is brilliant! Its inept plot and bad camera work and terrible acting are masterpieces of the genre of B movies. Ed Wood was a twisted genius!
 

The Mad Collector

Sergeant-at-Arms
Sep 1, 2010
9,918
2,850
62
Ironbridge UK
www.bearsonthesquare.com
#62
As I said, it's compelling. Brilliant it isn't, it's genius is in being so truly awful that it comes out the other side as a film you just have to see and what's more want to watch again which is more that I could say about a lot of good films. I'm a big Ed Wood fan and have several of his movies on DVD :laugh:
 

David Brown

Lance-Corporal
Jul 4, 2011
289
2,275
West Sussex
#64
The Mad Collector said:
... the star Bela Lugosi died after filming less than 3 or 4 minutes so was replaced by an amateur actor who was a lot taller and looked nothing like him...

"A lot taller"? How tall must he have been? Bela Lugosi was 6' 1".

I still say that none of those compares with my choice. They're are so inept that they're wonderfully entertaining, albeit for all the wrong reasons. Carry on England is simply unwatchable.
 

Clem Peppermint

Lance-Constable
Jun 11, 2024
25
550
Australia
#66
I just watched the movie Fall on Netflix recently and it has to be the worst two-odd hours I've ever spent!! Two girls decide to climb an incredibly tall cell tower in the middle of nowhere and (surprise, surprise) get stuck.

They had water, not one but TWO cellphones, flares, paper, pens, rope, harnesses; even a DRONE, and it still took them about a week to get down!

Although the filming quality, vfx and overall execution was quite good, the plotline and resolution were severely underdeveloped. The twist at the end was one of the best parts of the movie, but (spoiling as little as possible) considering that it was an 'it-was-all-a-dream' scenario, it was a bit lackluster (and, frankly, too little too late).

If anyone else has seen it, I'd be interested to hear your thoughts :)
 
Likes: Tonyblack

Penfold

Sergeant-at-Arms
Dec 29, 2009
9,071
3,050
Worthing
www.lenbrookphotography.com
#68
It's not one I've heard of, either.

On another note, 'Shark in Venice' starring Stephen Baldwin is one of those films to fall into the 'so bad it's good' category. About its only redeeming feature was being able to play spot the cliché and predict the next line throughout the film. :roflmao:
 

RathDarkblade

Moderator
City Watch
Mar 24, 2015
16,497
3,400
47
Melbourne, Victoria
#69
Um ... as for really bad films go, I could name three right off the bat:

- Any of the Sharknado films. (There were six. That's right, six. In the name of sanity, why?)

- Any of the Twilight films (do I even have to say why?)

- Any of the Fifty Shades films (ditto)

There are more on this reddit thread, but one of the reviews made me laugh:

When Time Ran Out", Paul Newman and Jacqueline Bisset, 1980. A volcano erupts on a small tropical island with a resort hotel. It has every tired old cliché imaginable (I mean, Red Buttons plays a retired circus tightrope artist. You can see where that's going).

I actually saw it in a theater. There's this one scene where Newman and Bisset are separated by a river of lava and the camera keeps switching back and forth between their faces - I finally said to my friend "I wish one of them would just fall in, I'm getting tired of watching them making googly eyes at each other". I must have said it too loud because several people around me started laughing.

Bad, bad, bad movie.
As for the worst? Well, I wouldn't call this film the worst, but at least three of the worst films I've seen are:

- The Passion of the Christ. Also known as "Let's rehash every antisemitic trope known to Catholicism, EVER." :mad:

I've heard that there's a sequel coming out soon. Apparently the provisional title is "Jesus Kicks Butt". :rolleyes:

- The Last Samurai. Of course. Because local people could never get anything done without the help of renegade American military officers. :rolleyes:

- The Patriot. Yes, Mel Gibson again. It's utter claptrap, but it's good-looking claptrap, with a stirring score. So of course it won lots of Oscars. ;)

- Braveheart. Alternative title: "Let's see how many Scots we can annoy." :rolleyes:

By the end of this thing, I was half-wishing they'd do to Mel Gibson what they did to William Wallace. I'm not kidding. I'm not Scottish, but I know the story of William Wallace, so I was somewhat annoyed but mostly bored with this overlong, POS film. "Are they done yet? Nope ..." :rolleyes:

I know, I get too worked up over this. Maybe. I just wish Hollywood (and especially Mel Gibson) would treat other people's history with maybe a tiny modicum of respect. That's not too much to ask, right? :)
 
May 20, 2012
12,327
2,900
#71
You're not wrong, Rath. I have never seen a Mel Gibson film, to my knowledge, but I have heard about them, and I also wish he would keep his hands off history. Go do honest fantasy films, people.
 

Quatermass

Sergeant-at-Arms
Dec 7, 2010
7,777
2,950
#72
Eh, it depends on what you do with history. I mean, the Nasuverse basically takes a pair of hedge-clippers to history, turning a lot of historical and mythological figures female, turning a few into aliens or robots, and that's before the REALLY weird stuff happens. I tolerate it from the Nasuverse because firstly, being a Japanese franchise, weirdness is to be expected, and secondly, it's a dark fantasy franchise that doesn't actually pretend to be entirely historically accurate all that much, and actually got me to look at the myths that inspired them. Though honestly, genderflipping historical and mythological figures has gotten old lately in that franchise.

As for The Passion of the Christ, well, the irony is, I like Jim Cavaziel, the actor who played Jesus in that, when he was in Person of Interest. And the guy who scored it, John Debney, was the guy who did the score to the Doctor Who TV movie of the 90s (amongst many, many other things). And while that TV movie had its faults, I actually liked the music, including Debney's rendition of the original theme music.


Though for the Eighth Doctor, Debney's theme was surpassed by David Arnold's theme for the Big Finish audio plays. Yes, that David Arnold, the composer for a number of the Bond films and the theme for Sherlock, did a Doctor Who theme.


You know, back on topic from my derailment, this thread's been going for more than four pages, and nobody's mentioned Mystery Science Theater 3000 yet...
 

RathDarkblade

Moderator
City Watch
Mar 24, 2015
16,497
3,400
47
Melbourne, Victoria
#73
Eh, it depends on what you do with history. I mean, the Nasuverse basically takes a pair of hedge-clippers to history, turning a lot of historical and mythological figures female, turning a few into aliens or robots, and that's before the REALLY weird stuff happens. I tolerate it from the Nasuverse because firstly, being a Japanese franchise, weirdness is to be expected, and secondly, it's a dark fantasy franchise that doesn't actually pretend to be entirely historically accurate all that much, and actually got me to look at the myths that inspired them. Though honestly, genderflipping historical and mythological figures has gotten old lately in that franchise.
Maybe. But that's because the Nasuverse does this to a whole lot of European historical figures, but probably wouldn't dare to do any of this to, say, Togukawa or Ieyasu. :p

You know, back on topic from my derailment, this thread's been going for more than four pages, and nobody's mentioned Mystery Science Theater 3000 yet...
That's because, compared to a lot of the movies we've mentioned, MST3000 is not bad. Sure, you have to watch it really, really cockeyed, but to be honest, MST3000 (for its age) is not that bad. ;)
 

Quatermass

Sergeant-at-Arms
Dec 7, 2010
7,777
2,950
#74
Maybe. But that's because the Nasuverse does this to a whole lot of European historical figures, but probably wouldn't dare to do any of this to, say, Togukawa or Ieyasu. :p
Umm, actually...while I can't speak for those two, they DID genderflip a LOT of famous Japanese figures as well. Minamoto-no-Raikou, Minamoto-no-Yoshitsune, Kato Danzo (who was also an automaton to boot), Okita Souji, Oda Nobunaga...hell, in the recent game Fate/Samurai Remnant, they made Yamato Takeru non-binary. It says a lot that a genderflipped Miyamoto Musashi is explicitly said to come from a parallel universe, and that the mainstream Nasuverse's Musashi was male.

About the only time it seems even remotely historically justifiable is when they bring up Nagao Kagetora/Uesugi Kenshin, whom historians have actually speculated was actually a woman.


That's because, compared to a lot of the movies we've mentioned, MST3000 is not bad. Sure, you have to watch it really, really cockeyed, but to be honest, MST3000 (for its age) is not that bad.;)
It in itself is not bad by any means, but it lampoons crappy films, hence why I'm astonished it or its spiritual successor Rifftrax haven't been mentioned here.
 

Latest posts

User Menu

Newsletter